Gun rights advocates can publish lawmakers’ addresses, judge rules

Using the “weapons” of the anti-gunner against them. Bureaucracy!

As much as this is a victory for firearm advocates in California, I also feel that it could be problematic.

“With great power, comes great responsibility.” as “Uncle Ben” from the “Spider-Man” comics would say. This is a huge blow to the anti-gun legislators in California, but it needs to be utilized responsibly.

All it will take, is for one person to screw it up by making death threats, or worse; and the whole house of cards will come tumbling down. Fueling the anti-gun position. Don’t give them the fuel for their fire. To be a responsible firearm owner, one must utilize safety, common sense, and a responsible demeanor. We all need to use that same level of caution when it comes to the Second Amendment fight.

As tempting and as funny as it would be to send one of those “Bag-O-Dicks” gummy candy packages to the “Ghost Gun” guy, it would only give them ammunition to use against us.

Fox News Reports:

Gun owners’ rights advocates are free to publish the home addresses and telephone numbers of California state lawmakers who voted for firearms restrictions, a federal judge decided Monday.

It is the second time in a week that judges decided that California lawmakers went too far in protecting the private information of public figures.

U.S. Chief District Judge Lawrence O’Neill of Fresno issued a preliminary injunction Monday blocking a state law that lets public officials demand that their private information be removed from the internet if they fear for their safety or the safety of their families.

O’Neill ruled that the state law is too broad and violates the advocates’ free speech rights. Publishing the lawmakers’ personal information “is a form of political protest,” he said in a 38-page opinion.

The bloggers were protesting a law that requires the state to collect the personal information of those who buy firearms and ammunition in California. When viewed in that context, the judge decided, “the legislators’ personal information becomes a matter of public concern.” (Read More)

js.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js">