The former installation commander of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio will serve 21 days in confinement after agreeing to a court-martial plea deal admitting fraternization.
Col. Christopher B. Meeker former commander of the 88th Air Base Wing, was removed from his leadership position in late December 2023. In December 2024, it was announced that he was facing three violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
The charges include “one charge and one specification under Article 90, Willfully Disobeying Superior Commissioned Officer; and another charge and two specifications under Article 134, Extramarital Sexual Conduct and Fraternization,” Wright-Patterson announced at the time in a press release.
Base spokespeople at Wright-Patterson did not immediately return a request for comment Tuesday afternoon from Military.com asking about Meeker’s plea or whether he faces a bench or jury trial.
Derek Kaufman, a spokesman for Air Force Materiel Command, told Military.com on Tuesday morning that the trial is docketed for two days but that could be subject to change.
The trial was originally scheduled for this summer at Scott Air Force Base in Illinois. However, it was announced in December that Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Commander Lt. Gen. Donna Shipton at Wright-Patterson could “be a material witness in the case,” adding the transfer to a different base was “in the interest of justice.”
Kaufman told Military.com in a statement that, for the “convenience of trial participants,” the court-martial would take place at Wright-Patterson. Scott Air Force Base’s 18th Air Force Commander Maj. Gen. Charles D. Bolton is still the convening authority.
Such moves aren’t uncommon in the military justice system. Eric Carpenter, a former military lawyer who is now a law professor at Florida International University, told Military.com in an interview Tuesday that choosing a convening authority or judge from another base eliminates any potential conflicts that might emerge, while having the trial locally prevents witnesses from having to pay for travel to a different base.
“That can happen when you have a convening authority that might otherwise be conflicted,” Carpenter said. “They find somebody neutral, and then that convening authority can refer the case.”
WHIO-TV, Dayton’s CBS affiliate, reported last year that Meeker was being represented by a defense lawyer with Joint Base Langley-Eustis Area Defense Counsel. Spokespeople for the counsel group did not immediately return a request for comment asking whether it was still representing Meeker.
Carpenter told Military.com that it’s “pretty unusual” for any allegations of consensual affairs to go to trial in the military justice system, saying they’re typically handled with administrative punishment.
Meeker’s trial this week follows other high-profile Air Force officers facing court-martial proceedings in recent years.