Breaking! Bumpstock ban continues!

The Trump administration moved to ban the sale and possession of bump-stocks by march! Shortly afterward the Fireams Policy Coalition filed a federal lawsuit and was seeking an injunction. However, a federal judge has ruled in favor of the Ban and has blocked the injunction. This just highlights how serious this situation is. You may not like bumpstocks. You may see them as a novelty but who is to say it wont just be bump-stocks, are they going to start coming after other “Scary looking” Items? We as responsible gun owners need to continue to fight to keep the 2nd Amendment going strong. Again, we have to reiterate that just posting on Facebook or in the comments on a YouTube video is NOT going to help our cause. We need to be more active as responsible gun owners and make our voices heard. Whether its writing your congressman, senators, or at the ballot box. The Firearms Policy Coalition isnt letting this happen without a fight and is filing for an appeal. This is setting a great example of what needs to be done. What certain other organizations should have done!

FoxNews Reports A federal judge rejected a challenge to the Trump administration’s ban on bump-fire stocks Monday.

United States District Judge Dabney L. Friedrich ruled against the plaintiffs in two consolidated federal lawsuits challenging a nationwide ban on the devices and asking for an injunction to prevent the ban from going forward and being enforced.

Bump-fire stocks came under scrutiny following a deadly 2017 massacre in Las Vegas, in which a gunman rigged his weapons with the devices to kill 58 people and injure nearly 900. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) responded, in part, by reconsidering its definition of machine guns to include “bump-stock-type devices.”

Bump stocks, also known by the brand name Slide Fire, modify rifles, turning them into automatic fire weapons. When the trigger on an automatic weapon is pulled once and held, the gun continues firing until the trigger is released.

The ATF had previously concluded bump-fire stocks were merely a gun accessory or firearm part, not subject to federal regulation. They were tightly regulated, but legal.

Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker signed a new federal regulation in December that concluded that bump-fire stocks fall within the prohibition on machine guns, and therefore are illegal under federal law.

In their complaint, the plaintiffs — Damien Guedes, the Firearms Policy Coalition, David Codrea and their co-plaintiffs — argued that the ATF violated procedural requirements, and that Whitaker did not, at the time, have the authority to set forth a ban.

Following Monday’s ruling, the plaintiffs issued a statement saying that have filed a notice of appeal and will continue to challenge the ban.

“We…

Read more!

 

View this post on Instagram

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. (February 25, 2019) — In response to tonight’s federal court ruling in the consolidated federal bumpstock lawsuits FPC v. Whitaker (WhitakerCase.com) and Guedes v. BATFE (BumpstockCase.com), which challenge the ATF’s Final Rule that bans “bump-stock” devices nationwide, the plaintiffs have jointly issued the following statement: We are disappointed but unsurprised by the Court’s ruling tonight denying a temporary injunction to protect Americans from an unlawful and unconstitutional regulation. It is important to note that today’s order is not a final ruling on any claim, and is merely a trial court’s denial of a temporary injunction. And while we had hoped for a quick and positive outcome at the trial court level, we have been and remain committed to litigating these issues as much as it takes to completely resolve the cases and protect Americans from a rogue and growing executive branch, including by petitioning the United States Supreme Court if necessary. Our attorneys have already filed notices of appeal with the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and will be moving to expedite the appeal. Our outstanding counsel have and will continue to make every effort to protect American gun owners and their private property from the Administration’s dangerous, retroactive, and confiscatory ban than will turn thousands of good people into felons and deprive people of their lawfully acquired private property. Gun owners who wish to support the costs of litigation and defend the Constitution may contribute at http://bit.ly/bumpstocks. Firearms Policy Coalition (firearmspolicy.org) is a 501(c)4 grassroots nonprofit organization. FPC’s mission is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, especially the fundamental, individual Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Firearms Policy Foundation (firearmsfoundation.org) is a 501(c)3 grassroots nonprofit organization. FPF’s mission is to defend the Constitution of the United States & the People’s rights, privileges, & immunities deeply rooted in this Nation’s history & tradition, especially the inalienable, fundamental, & individual right to keep & bear arms.

A post shared by Firearms Policy Coalition (@gunpolicy) on

 

 

View this post on Instagram

 

No one turn in shit. —————————————————————————A federal judge has allowed the Trump administration to move forward with its ban on bump stocks, devices that attach to semi-automatic weapons that allow them to fire rapidly like automatic weapons. Gun rights groups challenged the move, which came after Stephen Paddock used the device as he killed 58 people in Las Vegas on Oct. 1, 2017. In a 64-page order, Judge Dabney Friedrich denied a request for a preliminary injunction against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), which added bump stocks to their definition of “machine guns.” As a result of this new definition, bump stocks will be banned as of March 26, 2019. The groups who sued over this raised a number of claims, including the argument that the ATF didn’t follow proper administrative law procedure in creating what they believed to be a new rule. Judge Friedrich disagreed, saying that well-established court precedent allows government agencies “to reasonably define undefined statutory terms.” Continued ⬇️⬇️⬇️

A post shared by @Firearmchronicles (@firearmchronicles) on


js.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js">