80% Receivers are Firearms In Penn. According to AG Shapiro and Gov. Wolf!

The gun grabbers are at it again in another state this time they are two idiots pushed out a press release stating that, “” The opinion clarifies that, under the Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act, these receivers are properly classified as firearms in Pennsylvania.” However, According to Prince Law what AG Shapiro didnt take into account is the fact that only the General Assembly can write the law and that the General Assembly cannot delegate its authority, in the absence of providing a coherent framework that can be equally and consistently applied. W. Phila. Achievement Charter Elem. Sch. v. Sch. Dist. of Phila., 635 Pa. 127 (2016); Mary Ann Protz v. W.C.A.B. (Derry Area School District), 639 Pa. 645 (2017).

View this post on Instagram

 

Pennsylvania leadership decided to jump on the Ghost Gun bandwagon of ignorance today as Attorney General Shapiro and Governor Wolf announced that they decided to make up their own definition of what a firearm is. What’s a firearm to them, you might ask? ANYTHING that “may readily be converted” to expel a projectile. ⠀ ⠀ Read Pennsylvania attorney and friend of @gunpolicy Joshua Prince’s writeup on his state’s latest harebrained scheme to infringe on the Second Amendment. ⠀ ⠀ “PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW, CLASSIFIES 80% LOWERS AS “FIREARMS””⠀ ⠀ https://blog.princelaw.com/2019/12/16/pennsylvania-attorney-general-josh-shapiro-in-violation-of-the-law-classifies-80-lowers-as-firearms/

A post shared by Firearms Policy Coalition (@gunpolicy) on


According to the NRAILA Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro issued a tortured opinion defining partially-manufactured receivers as firearms.  This opinion flies in stark contrast to the current, and widely held, understanding that receivers that are unfinished and require additional work to operate as a functional frame or receiver are not considered firearms and therefore aren’t regulated as such.

Shapiro relies on two arguments to arrive at this absurd result.  One, that unfinished receivers are “designed” to expel a projectile by action of an explosive. It doesn’t take a law degree to figure out how backward this thinking is.   Partially-manufactured lowers are explicitly designed so that they are unable to expel a projectile by action of an explosive without further work.  In other words, by their very nature, they are not firearms.

Two, Shapiro claims that these receivers “may be readily converted (to expel a projectile)” which he argues is analogous to the “may readily be restored” language of the federal National Firearms Act.

With this make-believe bridge…

Read more!

You can Join the FPC in battling mission-critical Second Amendment lawsuits, or working to stop anti-gun bills in Congress, They are doing everything in our power to stop anti-gun billionaires like Bloomberg and overreaching politicians like Dianne Feinstein.

The only way to fund the pro-liberty lawyers, lobbyists, and grassroots activists is through the support of their members, so please consider joining the FPC Grassroots Army.

By joining FPC, you will help defend the Constitution from civilian disarmament and restore our Founders’ Second Amendment.

As a thank you for becoming a member today, they’ll send you their official FPC membership kit including a new, limited edition patch!

Don’t put this off! The Second Amendment hangs in the balance. Join the FPC Today and help fight unconstitutional gun laws!

Furthermore, Liberal Tears has pledged to send a portion of every dollar spent on their products to the Firearms Policy Coalition. 2 things happen when you shop at liberal tears the first is your guns are protected from rust and second they are protected from liberals as part of the proceeds are used to fight all unconstitutional gun laws.!

js.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js">